I just don't think I should have to go back and qualify everything thing in the same way every single time. I have said this over and over and over. why do I have to say it every single time?
I am not saying that all atheists are a hate group. I never said, that's i've repudiated that. I've never said it. I've always denied saying it. I've been very very careful to always say "this is isn't all atheists just a certain segment.
Now I think ti's really totally unfair that you expect me to admit that there are nut job extremists in the Christian camp. But I can't recognize the same thing for the atheist camp without certain atheists expanding it to all atheists and saying I"m treating them hatefully. Why would I post Hermit's stuff every single day. He sends about eight posts an day and i"ve never turned them down. I am clearly including him in the blogs and that's not enough.
If I am willing to qualify my statements why can't he respect that?
Or is it that it struck a nerve. Maybe he's what I'm talking about? Maybe it's really atheists he's angry at. I did not say one work to imply that he is one of the extremists. I usually call them "Dawkamentlaists" to show they are a totally different group.
I even took down the links that he thought were offensive. what more do you want man.I don't have the freedom of speech to observe that some little segment of atheists are extremists? Its' a lot more than that Zhavric guy. I can find them on every atheist board.
this is an emotional tantrum.