Wednesday, November 2, 2016

Crooked Hillary vs Traitor Trump: We Are At War

 photo liberty_zpsqsh5bs7h.jpg 
Marianne, French Uncle Sam, French Revolution.

I still can't get any conservatives or Hillary bashers to tell me what she's done that's illegal, Trumpies talk like she's on the lamb one actually said "she should turn herself in," That was one of the people responding to Jimmy Kimmel's joke man on the street survey and claimed to have seen an email on the news that Kimmel actually made up for the gag. At their convention they chanted "lock her up" you would think they would be able to tell me one thing she's done that's illegal. The closest they came to illegal was with the new email server controversy and they so far have no proof she did anything illegal. The Reps make it sound as though it's illegal just to use her own server but it is not. Republican presidents have done it. Bush destroyed 22 million emails.[1]  that the new emails have anything important, They don't know what,s on them and they did not have to make them public.

Besides that there's Benghazi and that is not a matter of legality but judgement. She;s also been exonerated on that because she asked for security it was the Republicans that held it up.[2] After that all they have is rumor and baggage. One friend who is making the disastrous error of supporting Trump listed a whole bunch of things about Hillary in response to my request for illegality. They were all things like: she was mean to the women who slept with Bill (the adulterers who slept with her husband) and the sailors on air craft carrier that hauled her around used the code name "broomstick one." So now "bitchy" is illegal? They want to lock her up for being mean and nagging a lot? That is all Petty rumor and innuendo. Then there is her speaking to businessmen for big money now, I taking money for rendering services to rich guys is illegal lock Trump up! If they are willing to pay so much to hear her speak why not? As for the dealings with Clinton foundation, people I know who work in non profit industry tell me that's SOP. She helped contributors get access to be in a position to help earth quake victims, wow what a crime! Not exactly as though she profited, Trump actually took money from his charity and used it for his persona needs,[3] The Clintons have never done that, Hillary is not charged with one crime Trump is invoked in  hundreds of suits and legal charges have been filed, he cheats people out of money and he;s even been charged child molesting, 
"Unrelatedly, Trump is facing a civil lawsuit from a Jane Doe who alleges that Trump raped her in 1994, when she was 13 years old, at parties hosted by the convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, who Trump called a friend. That lawsuit is scheduled to proceed in December, and Trump could be forced to testify under oath."[4]

Then there is Comrade Trump. Why "traitor?" Because he is enabling Putin to wage war on the united States. If he has his way it will soon be The united States of Trump. Trumptopia. Make no mistake about it, we are at war. The hacking of emails of the Democratic party by the Russian group Fancy bear and their attempt to influence our election through Wikileaks is nothing short of an act of war. Monday I showed that Trump is using his campaign to destabilize the country[5]:

(1) fomenting violence in the electoral process (that is a known tacitc in destabalizatiomn and you see it in ever Costa-Gravras film)

(2) casting doubt on the election results before it even happens

(3) urging supporters not accept results of he doesn't win

(4) as I showed last time dog whistling his followers to do voter intimidation at the polls and intimidation squads are already at work in Texas.

(5) Calling for the assassination of his opponent (several of his supporters are on record saying they hope this happens they hope she dies, someone should do it).[6]

(6) Labeling his opponent as law breaking vile "devil" and interjecting pure hatred for her to an extent that even calling or her death doesn't even strike anyone in his ranks as reason for doubting. This counts as a total disruption of the rational election process.

(7) At the same time there happens to be a coordinated barrage of damaging emails from a group, wikileaks that has ties to Putin and Moscow while the Russians are hacking the Democracts.

(8) expending a massive flood of disinformation and lies. People brush this off as Trump living in his own little World of make believe,even Hillary alluded to this in the debate. But it's a tactic it's part of destabilization. That is one of the things Roettenger told me they did as part of the coup against Guatemeala,.[7]

(9) Putin gave large sums to Trump organization people,[8]

Look at this objectively, what else is it but an attempt to destabilize the country while Russia wages Cyber war on us? It is clearly happening, Then you have those troubling payments from Russia to key people in Trump's organization.

Bottom line, Trump's stooge director Comey of FBI did not have to go public with the email story when he did. There was no reason to and there was reason not to as it violate federal law. The Hatch act prevents the FBI from influencing elections. He didn't worry about influence when he released the damaging info on the emails. He is guarding Trump from the damage of the other.[9] Gee it only looks like a duck right?

Hillary was not my first choice She wasn't my second choice. But she is the obvious choice we have now, because she's not an agent of a foreign power, and her goals for the country are well meaning and she has the ability to handle the job.I can't say any of that about Trump.

A Veteran Spy Has Given the FBI Information Alleging a Russian Operation to Cultivate Donald Trump[10]

We need to wake up and face the fact that we are under attack. We are in danger of losing our democracy, as we have never been before. Trump is trying to destabilize the country and destroy democracy, so he can take full power.


all  accessed 11/1/16 
[1] Nina Burleigh, "The Bush Whitehoue lost 22 Million Emails," Newsweek, Sept 12, 2016

JUNE 28, 2016
[3] Conor Friendersdorf, "How Donald Trump Exploited Charity For Personal Gain," Atlamtic
Sep 13,2016

[4] David Graham, "The Many Scandals of Donald Trump," The Atlantic, oct 13,2016

[5]Joeseph Hinman, "The Reichstag is Burning," Metacrock's Blog, Oct 30,2016, URL

[6] David Smith, "rump Hints at Assassination of Hillary Clinton by Gun rights supporters,"
The Guardian, 10, August, 2016

[7] Hinman, op cit

[8] Andrew Kramer , et al.,"Secret Ledger in Ukraine Lists Cash for Trump's Campaign Chief." New York Times (August 14, 2016)

Newsgroupspeak reports ABC news reported hundreds of millions from  Moscow to Trump

[9]David Usborne, "FBI is sitting on explosive information regarding Donald Trump and Rssia."
The Indepement, oct 31 2016

[10] David Corn,"A Veteran Spy Has Given the FBI Information Alleging a Russian Operation to Cultivate Donald Trump;"Mother Jones oct 31,2016

Sunday, October 30, 2016

The Reichstag is Burning: Trump's Coup d'etat

 photo 800px-Reichstagsbrand_zps3riqibzc.jpg

I do know something about how to conduct a coup and over throw a government, what do I know? In 1989 I was an activist for The Committee in Solidarity With the People of El Salvador (CISPES) we worked on all central America issues. We brought in a speaker named Philip Clay Roettinger, he was in charge of over throwing the democratically electided Arbinz government of Guatemala imn 1954. He told me all about how he did it (he was working for CIA at the time).[2] I helped set up his tour in Dallas and  drove him around, my brother and I.They struck on multiple fronts. They took control of the media ad put out their propaganda as news, they created concussion and strife in many sectors and made the afraid for fear of violence,

If we open our eyes and look at this years  election we can see this very strategy Beijing applied now by the Trump political machine, When Trump first started encouraging his stooges to observe voting and make sure there is no fraud I observed that this is a dog whistle it really means intimidate the other side and suppress the vote, We now have main stream media reports of voter intimidation squads brassily going ab out Hispanic neighborhoods in Dallas asking elderly Hispanics how they are voting![3]  Hispanic community  organizers report elderly are telling them they are afraid to vote,[4]

Hispanic leaders in Tarrant County have filed a complaint with the U.S. Justice Department, alleging that senior citizens are being intimidated into not voting.
The Fort Worth Star-Telegram reports that the complaint from the United Hispanic Council of Tarrant County says a voter fraud investigation has "left a trail of confused and upset seniors who are now afraid of voting," either in person or by absentee ballot.
Concerns have arisen over mail-in ballots, which some people think can lead to "vote harvesting" — the illegal process of filling out and returning the ballots of valid voters without their consent....This is voter suppression," Fort Worth Councilman Sal Espino told the Star-Telegram. "When these people go talk to seniors, they are accusing them of doing something wrong, making it seem as though they shouldn't have voted by mail."[5]
These guys are actually going door to door in older Hispanic neighborhoods pretending to be :"vote inspectors" and trying to convey the impression that the people did something wrong to vote absentee, [6] Presumably the word gets around don't vote or these inspectors will come. Star Telegram. Dallas Morning News, fox4, WBAP these are some of the most respected news media in Dallas and have been all my life, They are Republican slanted most of eh time, This is not a Democratic trick this is hard news.

Trump has carefully laid the ground work for this. He does not have to tell anyone to go door to door, it's just the kind of thing his stooges come up with on their own but egged on by Trump's constant insistence for months that the election will be rigged, Of course he never says how he knows this but gives the impression that he has inside information. This is what "they" do all the time, We are dealing with the devil herself so we have to be extra careful. He has been spewing this hogwash for months (since August) [7] 

On a completely different level there is the email propaganda. Wiklileaks has been releasing it every day since august in a calculated effort to control our election. The link between Wikileaks and Putin is well known no mystery there, .He's clearly seeking to aid Trump[8] Trump publicly asked the Russians to interfere in our election.[9] Trump supporters talk like Hillary's use of private server is the treasonous act like it's  highly illegal bit it's not illegal at all.,When I point out that every other secretary of state has done it and that Bush and Cheney did it and they destroyed thousands of emails [10] they switch to abortion. She is or abortion so they can't vote for her, That's not illegal.

Then yesterday they tried springing the October surprise. The FBI has reported the email investigation there are thousands of more emails that prove he;s guilty, Suddenly the election springs back the other way .Trump has won! it's over president ;Trump is ready to take office,. according to local republican media.

(1) it's not re opened but finding new emails had to be reported to the committee

(2) they are not Hillary's emails they her functionaries

(3) They don't know what is on them they could just as easily be unimportant

(4) The FBI director violated policy because they usually don't want to influence elections, they could easily have waited a week.

(5) now he admits he did it to help Trump

The truth is much less explosive. There is no indication the emails in question were withheld by Clinton during the investigation, the law enforcement official told Newsweek, nor does the discovery suggest she did anything illegal. Also, none of the emails were to or from Clinton, the official said. Moreover, despite the widespread claims in the media that this development had prompted the FBI to “reopen” the case, it did not; such investigations are never actually closed, and it is common for law enforcement to discover new information that needs to be examined.[11]

According to CBS Reid accusses FBI head Comey of  sitting on the proof taht Trump works for Putin and violated the Hatch act

In his last few months in the Senate, Minority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nevada, isn’t pulling any punches -- especially after the recent revelations by FBI Director James Comey that more emails were found that could be related to the Clinton email probe. 
The pugilistic Reid, who plans to retire after finishing out this term in Congress, penned a blistering letter to Comey Sunday, accusing the FBI chief of holding back “explosive” information about Donald Trump’s close Russian ties while possibly violating the Hatch Act by reviving the Clinton email investigation. 
“Your actions in recent months have demonstrated a disturbing double standard for the treatment of sensitive information, with what appears to be a clear intent to aid one political party over another,” Reid wrote, adding that through Comey’s “partisan actions, you may have broken the law.”[12]

It's just another part of the coup attempt. It's just one of the multiple  levels of confusion destabilization requires, These are the same kinds of things we did to destroy the Nicaragua democracy or the Guatemalan democracy of 54, and Putin did to destroy Ukraine democracy. It is obvious to me (I know I am no expert but I some things) that this is a classic case just on a boarder scale.  If we need a stronger commendation to foreign power, the Putin government has paid big money to Trump;'s people. [13]

Several have said if Trump loses they already to fight with guns blazing and one said Hilary needs to be assassinated, Trump is not going to stop just because he loses. This is only the beginning of Putin's revenge on democracy for winning the cold war.[14]

The Boston Globe reports that Trump supporters are starting to believe what the GOP presidential nominee has repeatedly told them — that the election will be "rigged" as part of a massive conspiracy to defeat him at the hands of "crooked Hillary." And the impact of Trump's incendiary statements could be felt far beyond Election Day, undermining Americans' faith in democracy and making it difficult to govern — or worse. “If she’s in office, I hope we can start a coup. She should be in prison or shot. That’s how I feel about it,” Dan Bowman, a 50-year-old contractor, said of Clinton at recent rally in Cincinnati. “We’re going to have a revolution and take them out of office if that’s what it takes. There’s going to be a lot of bloodshed. But that’s what it’s going to take. . . . I would do whatever I can for my country.”At a rally in North Carolina on Friday, Trump declared: “It’s one big fix. This whole election is being rigged.’’At the same rally, a Trump supporter attacked a protester, shoving him and putting him in a headlock, as the crowd erupted in chants of "USA, USA!": [15]


[1] Wikiv article

The Reichstag fire (German: ReichstagsbrandAbout this sound listen ) was an arson attack on the Reichstag building in Berlin on 27 February 1933. Marinus van der Lubbe, a young Dutch council communist, was caught at the scene of the fire and arrested for the crime. Van der Lubbe was an unemployed bricklayer who had recently arrived in Germany. He declared that he had started the fire and was tried and sentenced to death. The fire was used as evidence by the Nazi Party that communists were plotting against the German government. The event is seen as pivotal in the establishment of Nazi Germany."
[2] Wikipedia articleon Roettinger (accessed 10/30/16)
[3] Tom Steele, "Tarrant county group claims sioemers are beimg intimidated into not voting," Dallas News, Dallas Mornking News, online news URL (accessed 10/30/16)
I also saw the report on air yesterday on Fox 4 local news in Dallas.
[4] Ibid.
[5] Ibid.
[6] WBAP 820 radio,"Rights Group Claims Ft Worth Hispanics Face Voter Intimidation." Posted on
this is the most respected radio news source in North Texas and has been since 1960s
[7] Jamelle Bouie,"Donald Trump is Settimga Timeb omb for Racial Violence"Dallas News powered by Dallas Morning News, commemtary, oct 11. 16 online URL

Jamelle Bouie is chief political correspondent for Slate, which first published this column.
[8] Max Chafkinand and Vernon Silver, "How Julian Assange Turned WikiLeaks Into Trump’s Best Friend,"Bloom 
From  (accessed 10/30/16)

[9] Philip Rucker, et al, "Trump invites Russia To meddle In US Presidential Race" The Washington Post, July 27, 2016
(accessed 10/30/16)

[10] Nina Burleigh, "The Bush Whitehoue lost 22 Million Emails," Newsweek, Sept 12, 2016

[11] Kurt Eichenwold, "HlaryClinton's Emails" NewsWeek 10,l28.16

Saturday, October 29, 2016

October Surprise canceled,email not re opened, Hillary still winning

Republicans across America cackled with glee as the latest bogus “news” story about Hillary Clinton’s emails took the Internet by storm. After all, Fridays are slow news days and reporters gotta report. But, as Laurence Lewis from Daily Koswants to remind everyone, “despite the horrendous reporting, the FBI is NOT reopening” their investigation of Hillary Clinton’s emails.

Read more Get details

Thursday, October 13, 2016

What ever happened to the Bible? Go on any message board where atheists congregate and start a discussion of any kind that invovles using the Bible as an authority and they will immediately say things that sound as though the Bible doesn't even exist. They regard it as such a pile of crap they wont even tolerate the possibility that it might be defended. One time on a message board (CARM) someone said that I have no way of distinguishing which passages are mythology and which are not. This is an atheist who knows me and knows I'm somewhat liberal. This guy was saying I can't distinguish true passages from ad ons but I just choose what I like. I listed a criteria for understanding mythology, it was a criteria based upon historical critical methods. This is what this other atheist responded. We also discussed the validation of the Bible as a historical artifact. I said the Gospels were historical artifacts that testify to the beliefs of the people who wrote them. That seems like a fairly a priori sort of statement--true by definition--but people are so bad at understanding logic they think that a priori must be a violation of logic instead a kind of logic, becuase they have been led to accept the phrase that teaches them to confuse true by definition with circular reasoning. So the second major issue for the day was historical life of Jesus and the inability of the Gospels to furnish any sort of historical documentation for the same. I listed three ways that we can validate the Gospels historically and this was one response: 

I had said that by historical critical methods we can corroborate the Gospels as historical evidence of Jesus' existence. I also laid out an extensive criteria for determining what is mythology and what is not. I didn't claim the Bible corroborates itself. There is obviously a method or no book could ever be corroborated. That method is called "historical critical method." This is so basic and these guys act like I made it up. They are practically saying there's no such thing as historical criticism. This more than more than anything else shows the Orwellian nature of atheism. Anything that they can't out argue by reason or historical fact they merely claim doesn't exist and make to go away because they don't like it. They just brain wash their mentions into thinking "there can't be such a thing as historical critical methods." 

7 levels of verification or Gospels

(1) The original pre Mark redaction
(2)the Pauline corups: Witnesses relying info to Paul and creedal formulae
(3) Paul's saying source
(4) extra canonical Gospels such as Peter and Thomas
(5) Oral tradition
(6)The Gospels themselves in the form in which we know them
(7) writers who write about their relationships with those who were there.

These "levels" represent source from which we get the Gospel story. Obviously some of them overlap such as pre Mark redaction and sources that use that redaction. But the same material comes up though different trajectories that is verification it shows that material was circulating and was available though more than one source. The empty tomb is part of pre Mark redactiomn it comes up in canonical gospels and non canonical gospels,

1) The original pre Mark redaction 

Sources of proof include Koester's book Ancient Christian Gospels, Jurgen denker, 
John D. Crosson, 
Ray Brown, 
Philipp Vielhauer, Geschichte, 646 
Peter kirby says its consensus in the field. 

(2)the Pauline corups 
....(a) what he got form people who were there 
Quoting Paul himself: quotes James, the Jerusalem church's creedal formula and hymns. 

(3) his saying source. 
Koester documents 
synoptic saying source 

........(c) the chruch tradition he learned in Jerusalem 

(4) extra canonical Gospels such as Peter and Thomas 
Koester documents 
Hennecke-Schneemelcher-Wilson, NT Apocrypha 1.96 

Charles Hendrick and Paul Mirecki 

Ron Cameron, ed., The Other Gospels: Non-Canonical Gospel Texts (Philadelphia, PA: The Westminster Press 1982), pp. 23-37.) 

Peter KIrby's site "Gosepel of Thoams" 

Stephen J. Patterson, Gospel of Thomas and Jesus 

Stevan L. Davies, The Gospel of Thomas: Annotated and Explained (Skylight Paths Pub 2002) 

(5) Oral tradition 
Papias (from Eusebius) 
Robert C. Cully,Oral Tradition and Biblical Studies 

(6)The Gospels themselves which reflect the community as a whole, a whole community full of people who were there. 

(7) writers who write about their relationships with those who were there. 
1 Clement (the source) 
Richardson and Fairweather, et al. Early Christian Fathers, New York: MacMillian, 1970 p.45-46). 
F.F. Bruce, NT documents 
Irenaeus, Agaisnt heresies and missing fragment supplied by Calvin 

Eusebius Ecclesiastic histories 
Papias, fragments (Peter Kirby, Early Christian Writings, site: 
Schoedel 1967: 91-92; 
Kortner 1983: 89-94, 167-72, 225-26). 
Documents of the Christian Church, edited by Henry Bettonson, Oxford University press 1963, 27). 

Ante-Nicene Fathers vol 1 
Calvin College 

Iranaeus describes works of Papis 

Seteven Carlson's site: 

these face statements like "the Gospels have no backing" and telling me I haven't done anything to prove anything, this is not good enough see? It's' an untruth. 

Here are three pages on religious A priori that apply the above outline and flesh it out with the actual  quotations.

Monday, October 10, 2016

ecision Guide,. Hillary vs Trump

The latest fact-checking video from CNN’s Jake Tapper focuses on three claims that Donald Trump made in his June 22 speech attacking Hillary Clinton’s character. Trump claimed that U.S. Ambassador to Libya Chris Stevens “was left helpless to die as Hillary Clinton soundly slept in her bed.” That’s f...

Let me aid the decision making process. Most republicans I know will acknowledge Trump is course and ill manured imn a kind of "boys will be boys" good time scolding of a prankster. but they see Hillary as true evil.;
What realistically is the worst thing about each? I( can't get republicans to give an answer on what Hillary has actually done wrong, most of the things they say just about her just amount to baseless baggage from the past and the idea that conservatives hate her so she must be bad. Republicans admitted that their house committee was put together to destroy her Presidential bid, They are just saying we hate her because she is hated.

The worst thing I can find that she may have done is delay in getting aid to US diplomats in Benghazi, Please read fact check .org [1] This article show step by step how the republican propaganda machine created the destroy and the congressional investigation to destroy Hillary's campaign,.

I admit she may be blameworthy in acting too slowly. 

compare that to three facts about Trump:
(1) Trump indicates that he thinks we can win a nuclear war, he says we would be safer if japan had nucs.[2] That implies he either doesn't k 500 warheads is all it would take to destroy all life,[3] The fact that he think we can win a nuclear war makes it more likley he wold start one, Plus he said he feels safer i Japan had nucs that means he's pro proliferation, That increases the chances of nuclear war.
(2) he thinks global warming is a hoax, It is a fact that the polar ice cap is half the size it was at the begging of the last century, watch Inconvenient Truth to see the hell we are headed for in terms of climate change,.Trump is so backward he wont even accept that a problem exists,[4]
(3) He actually called upon a foreign dictator to influence our elections, there is strong evidence that he is an agent of that dictator., That dictator (Putin) is a former KGB agent who hates us for wining the cold war, There was Putin money for Trump's campaign manager. [5]

Even if Hillary was Jack the Ripper it would not outweigh all of that.

[1] Fact Check .org a list of artiocles om the Benghazi story (10/8/16)
[2] Zack Beauchamp"Trumps Comments on Japanese Nucks are Worrisome" Vox ()March 31 2016)  accessed 10/8/16
[3] Nuclear Winter

this article says 100 firestorms equal to Hiroshima would start it, the assumption is U,W. and SUUR going at it, that was the assumption in the model, But I assume a nuclear conflict between Japan and N,Korea would drag US and Russia into it, this article  says nuclear winter would not happen now with today decrease megatunage, But ev en so I think all the radiation would really destroy all life on earth, Nuclear War Survival Skills, a websote, argues that nuclear war is survivable. but it also sways:

An all-out nuclear war between Russia and the United States would be the worst catastrophe in history, a tragedy so huge it is difficult to comprehend. Even so, it would be far from the end of human life on earth. The dangers from nuclear weapons have been distorted and exaggerated, for varied reasons. These exaggerations have become demoralizing myths, believed by millions of Americans.
Global zero:
A 2014 report published in the journal Earth's Future found that even a regional war of 100 nuclear detonations would produce 5 teragrams of black soot (that's 5,000,000,000 kg!) that would rise up to Earth's stratosphere and block sunlight. This would produce a sudden drop in global temperatures that could last longer than 25 years and temporarily destroy much of the Earth's protective ozone layer. This could also cause as much as an 80% increase in UV radiation on Earth's surface and destroy both land and sea-based ecosystems, potentially leading to global nuclear famine.Michael Mills, an atmospheric scientist at the National Center for Atmospheric Research in Boulder, Colorado and the study's lead author, summarized it best
ok so it would be worth it to have one to keep Hillary out of office.?

[4] Erica Goode, "What are Donald Trump's Views on Climate Change? Some clues Emerge," New York Times, (MAY 20, 2016)
He has called global warming a “hoax,” for example, and claimed that the Chinese fabricated climate change (just a joke, he later said). And inan interview this week with Reuters, he said that he was “not a big fan” of the Paris climate accord, and that “at a minimum I will be renegotiating those agreements.”
But more clues about Mr. Trump’s views on environmental issues emerged this week from a four-page briefing on energy policy prepared for the presumptive Republican nominee by Representative Kevin Cramer, Republican of North Dakota and an early supporter of Mr. Trump.
Mr. Cramer, who defines himself as a climate change skeptic, discussed in his briefing paper a variety of government regulations that Mr. Trump might do away with if he were president.

Longer term, if emissions continue to rise unchecked, the risks are profound. Scientists fear climate effects so severe that they might destabilize governments, produce waves of refugees, precipitate the sixth mass extinction of plants and animals in Earth’s history, and melt the polar ice caps, causing the seas to rise high enough to flood most of the world’s coastal cities.
this is a website put up by NASA everyone should read this aritlce weather you all about it or nothing,

Scientific evidence for warming of the climate system is unequivocal.

- Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change

The current warming trend is of particular significance because most of it is very likely human-induced and proceeding at a rate that is unprecedented in the past 1,300 years.1Earth-orbiting satellites and other technological advances have enabled scientists to see the big picture, collecting many different types of information about our planet and its climate on a global scale. This body of data, collected over many years, reveals the signals of a changing climate.
The heat-trapping nature of carbon dioxide and other gases was demonstrated in the mid-19th century.2 Their ability to affect the transfer of infrared energy through the atmosphere is the scientific basis of many instruments flown by NASA. There is no question that increased levels of greenhouse gases must cause the Earth to warm in response.
Ice cores drawn from Greenland, Antarctica, and tropical mountain glaciers show that the Earth’s climate responds to changes in greenhouse gas levels. They also show that in the past, large changes in climate have happened very quickly, geologically-speaking: in tens of years, not in millions or even thousands.3
[5] Andrew Kramer , et al.,"Secret Ledger in Ukraine Lists Cash for Trump's Campaign Chief." New York Times (August 14, 2016)