this is one of the major exchanges the other day that brought to senses after so many years and showed me that these guys are just farts in the wind and not worth wasting my time on. so I'm not going back. The woods are full atheist antics to talk about.
Originally Posted by hsmithson
that's why I jacked it down to warrant. you just gave away the sore. go good going. you just proved me right do not get that?
this is answering an argument by Mark UK
A fallacy is a fallacy, no matter what the "level" of the argument. For example, citing a "timeless void" when you haven't shown that such a thing is even possible.Meta
he's trying to say that I canker prove there is a timeless. that just shows he doesn't understand the first thing about it.
It's an atheist argument genius!
why do you think Krauss calls his book a universe from nothing? That's the atheists position. no God, it just popped up out of nothing. that is Karuss's position, it was Stenger's position it's been most atheists positions.
when I say it can't happen I'm saying the atheist version of how things came to be can't be true. when he say I can't prove as valid he's actually saying I can't prove the atheist's postilion, not my own.
remember last time they were trying to intimidate me so they said "this is an actual Ph.D. (the guy I was arguing with). being sarcastic and whemical I said "I'm a virtual Ph.D." they really acutely thought i was trying to claim to have a degree called "virtual Ph.D."
even after I explained they were being dull witted I was being witty they still tried to say that.
btw the thing about the timeless void they have made that mistake a million times. over years thousands of times I've argued "time can begging out of a timeless (therefore there must be an eternal origin like God) they say "you can't prove there was ever a timeless void."
Originally Posted by ragarth
I didn't. I said "virtual" apparently you don't know what the words means. there's a reason why they call the internet virtual reality. it's not realty. do you not understand that? I met every criteria for getting the Ph.D. but the last one so I deserve the honor. I had 4.0 for five years. I didn't get it becasue I had to help my parents. I don't give a **** what you think about that. I know what's true. you don't care about truth.
'Moreover I'm not proclaiming for myself the honor but the knowledge. I earned the knowledge from doing the work.
You are not deserving of the respect and privileges of having a doctorate, and claiming that you have a 'virtual' doctorate shows that you not only have no respect for atheists, but no respect for people who have actually earned their doctorates.Meta
dumbass!! you don't deserve the respect. you can keep your stupid respect I have the knowledge. you don't have it. this moron never went to graduate school or he would know better.
but he's not done yet, he's not to say some more stupid stuff.
Let me rephrase that. You did not earn a doctorate. You do not deserve the honors or respect that comes from having a doctorate. You may think you did the work to get one, but if that were true, then one would be given to you. You either did non-doctorate work, or the person evaluating you for your doctorate decided that you did not, as a matter of fact, do the workwhat a dumb butthole. He just the extreme ignorance of his lack of knowledge about the graduate school process. "you didn't do you doctoral work or they would have given it to you." He's assuming that I was graded adamantly and made bad grades I did fail. I did not get bad grades I got good grades I have 4.0 semester after semester. I've told the little atheist zombies this time after time. I had to give studies to care fro my parent they were DY-9ng! you undersatnd dying? I had to change nappies. and wipe hist smash asses and bring them their pills and keep my mother frm wondering off (alzhiemers). I did for three years.
God gave me a Ph.D. in love for what did my parents. I proud of what I did for them. I essentially gve up the only change I had to accomplish anything to make their years happy. I proud of that I would do it again. that is not a failure. you are the failures because you stupid to understand anything.
If you did the work they would give the degree how stupid can you get?
annother athist idiot:
To claim that you have a 'virtual' doctorate puts you lower than someone claiming to have a doctorate from a diploma mill.
YOU ARE STUPID ENOUGH TO THINK THAT. WHAT A AN INTELLECTUAL WUSSY . only an idiot would think that. what a stupid person you are.
no wonder you don't believe in God. you just dont HAVE the intelligence to understand ideas.
virtual means almost or phony simulacra obviously I was saying that I almost got one it was sac ****** too boot, stupid.
the fool answers:
If you feel offended at being mocked for having your ever so special (nonexistent) doctorate, well, you deserve to be mocked. You haven't *earned* those honors. Quit pretending your more than you are.
you git. it's your stupidity that turned into a mock degree fool.
you also have this ridiulous idea of a degree and what knowlede is. I have the knolwde which all I calim to have becuase I did the work. I did most of it well becuase I made A's the whole way through.
Ph.D. is not a big honor that give you for doing your studies. it's a qualification it showed you are qualified to teach or practice in some field. I have the knoweldge for the qualification then deserve the honor. I failed getting didn't jump through the last couple of hoops, I chose to quite. they didn't kick me out. I quite.undestand stupid?