Stupid Atheist trick of the Week

arguing with Deist on CARM. the thread is an attempt (again) to mock and ridicule the subject matter of my arguments on religious experience. They are talking teh M scale by Ralph Hood which is a control for study of religious experience. A means of understanding if one has had real mystical experience or not.

There's really not much more to say. Taking anonymous loaded surveys that would be answered only by God believers, and then having a religious whacko interpret the answers and proclaim there is a God is hardly an unbiased study. I read up on this Hood guy, and see he's a religious nutzo. Everything he writes about revolves around religion. Just because he somehow got a PH D from Phoenix college or some other such "college" doesn't mean the guy has any credibility. What ELSE would a religios nut conclude frrom loaded surveys? That there is no God?

Originally Posted by Deist

There's really not much more to say.

not when you don't know what you are talking about.

you are not answering the quotes I put up. It hasn't occurred to you that the study in the Backup thread is corroboration of the M Scale.

Taking anonymous loaded surveys that would be answered only by God believers, and then having a religious whacko interpret the answers and proclaim there is a God is hardly an unbiased study.

In other words yu don't know what social scinece research is. it's alluded you that social science research involves hiding your purpose form the respondent so they don't answer the way you want. In other words you knowing about reserach!

I read up on this Hood guy, and see he's a religious nutzo.

No it doesn't. you is no source anywhere that say "Hood is religious nutzo." you are assuming because you don't' like his research, even though you don't sundress it.

you are assuming "He studies snake handlers so he must me one." that's proof you are a bigoted ignorant anti-intellectual pipsqueak who doesn't' undrestand social scineces.

My intro psychology professor was did a study on Transvestites but he not a transvestite do you understand?

Everything he writes about revolves around religion. Just because he somehow got a PH D from Phoenix college or some other such "college" doesn't mean the guy has any credibility. What ELSE would a religios nut conclude frrom loaded surveys? That there is no God?

that's is field Einstein. psychology of religion duh?

btw don't look now everything Dawkins rights is about religion does that mean he's a religious nutzo?