Tuesday, December 27, 2011

CARM lies and atheist lies

I got banned on carm because that shit hole "Blondie" aka Steve Smith aka MIv aka Deiest who has been hounding me for weeks goaded me into making insults and then turned me in after telig me that I did wrong to turn him in .

the message board thing is really stupid. I have been a fool to post on that toxic carm Math Slick is an idiot and the atheists who post there are stupid as dirt.

The last exchange I had one of them was saying something about no evidence God I reminded him that I had 200 studies that none of them will read. Then he asserted that they have read them, again. that is a lie that have told over and over again. Every time I've looked what they claim is a study it's not. They have to read one. those who claim have read either a summary article that talks about all the studies (but the author did a study so the name being the same they same they assume it's the study) or a study that is ot one of the 200 but it in fact a study. So then assert that they know all about it because they read 2 studies, weather they fit or not.


They are not intellectuals they are not thinkers. They are trying to be thinkers they are trying to get their rocks of by venting their hatred for God via bullying Christians.

6 comments:

Whateverman said...

As a CARM newbie and a secular forums member, my experience there has been markedly different from your description, Metacrock.

I wont claim atheists are all nice or correct or intellectual, and I certainly wont defend secular forum members in general. However, my limited experience suggests that your arrogance is largely the cause of you being banned.

Joseph Hinman (Metacrock) said...

my so called arrogance is a result of reaction to the way atheist have treated me; I wont knuckle under to their bullying. open your eyes and examine how unfair they are.

they have demeaned upon down that they have the studies and they have not. when they say those are it is not on the list. every single time I point it out "that's not one fo the studies." next time they declaim that it is.

Open your eyes and examine their lies, they dishonesty, their behavior.

Whateverman said...

my so called arrogance is a result of reaction to the way atheist have treated me;

Ok, that actually makes sense.

The problem (from my perspective only) is that you treated everyone the same way, regardless of what they'd said. You seemed to stop responding to what people wrote, and instead pretended they were too stupid to respond to.

That's unjustifiable arrogance. I honestly don't care too much about people who behave this way, but it can lead to the kind of things that get folks banned from forums with rule-sets like CARM's.

Seriously, I don't hold any grudges, and don't care whether we ever have another conversation again. What I *am* trying to do is show that your behavior would have gotten you banned elsewhere, too, and that's not the fault of the atheists at CARM.

In any case, Happy New Year

Joseph Hinman (Metacrock) said...

my so called arrogance is a result of reaction to the way atheist have treated me;

Ok, that actually makes sense.

The problem (from my perspective only) is that you treated everyone the same way, regardless of what they'd said. You seemed to stop responding to what people wrote, and instead pretended they were too stupid to respond to.

>>>I disagree that I did that. I may be seem because I get bogged down. I am essentially alone against usually at least 12 people. 12 opponents in six threads, thins stack up. I can't always skip giving individually tailored answers. then you have people like Blondie whose only desire is to screw me over so naturally I stop answering guys like that, and Deist.

when I get more fractious I start dealing with things in a more homogeneous way.




That's unjustifiable arrogance.

No it's not. see above.


I honestly don't care too much about people who behave this way, but it can lead to the kind of things that get folks banned from forums with rule-sets like CARM's.

real easy for people have never stood against the mob to makes judgments. You may never take a stand that puts you alone against the mob. until you do that you have no right to judge becuase you don't how understand how it is.

that's what I see going on at carm> i am standing against the mob.



Seriously, I don't hold any grudges, and don't care whether we ever have another conversation again. What I *am* trying to do is show that your behavior would have gotten you banned elsewhere, too, and that's not the fault of the atheists at CARM.


I don't don't I have any bad behavior. of cousre being an athiest ou are totally blind to wha they do that I'm defending myself form. you don't realie the depth of their lies. most of the things they say bout me are lies. they are just lies.

every single time they say "we di read your studies' that's damn lie. they have not. I've proved that over and over again. their arguments against my studs are stupid and assign.

those guys do not have any regard for turth or fact. you can prove stuff to their faces over and over they just stop listening.

In fact most of them don't read 90% of the posts I make then talk about them as though "I answered everything yous aid" and it's obvious they quite reading after the third sentence.

In fact they have admitted "we don't' read long posts."

back about 2004 when Dawkins first got big atheists took the tact that "if doesn't' matter what we say or how we lie because theists are wrong and stuipd no matter weather we fit the fact or not they are always wrong." form that day on they have done this thing of ignoring most of what is said.

Whateverman said...

Metacrock, I am not an atheist

yet from the very first interchange between the two of us, you assumed otherwise, and that I was insulted you, and you failed to respond to what I'd actually written. It took me pointing this out to you before you actually stopped and took what I wrote seriously.

You did this to me four times, and now I'm here commenting at your blog.

Dude, if you're smart, you're behaving irrationally & arrogantly. Again, I don't particularly care; you're completely free to be whoever you and and behave however you choose. However, you labor under the impression that everyone who disagrees with you has somehow wronged you in some way, and is thus to be treated with disdain.

That's arrogance.

Do whatever you want. I'm just trying to give you an unbiased account of what I've seen.

Joseph Hinman (Metacrock) said...

Metacrock, I am not an atheist

yet from the very first interchange between the two of us, you assumed otherwise, and that I was insulted you, and you failed to respond to what I'd actually written.

I don't see how you can say that I didn't respond to what you wrote I did exactly so. I am sorry if you think I assumed you are an atheist.


It took me pointing this out to you before you actually stopped and took what I wrote seriously.

as I say you have not been attacked all the time by everyone fr years on end have you? one develops habits.


You did this to me four times, and now I'm here commenting at your blog.

Dude, if you're smart, you're behaving irrationally & arrogantly. Again, I don't particularly care; you're completely free to be whoever you and and behave however you choose. However, you labor under the impression that everyone who disagrees with you has somehow wronged you in some way, and is thus to be treated with disdain.

That's arrogance.

Do whatever you want. I'm just trying to give you an unbiased account of what I've seen.


you have failed to respond to a thing I said.