tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6538255877506581515.post8706976503731915506..comments2023-11-22T09:00:59.909-08:00Comments on Atheistwatch: Atheism and Self Desceptive Game of "Empicial Proof"Joseph Hinman (Metacrock)http://www.blogger.com/profile/06957529748541493998noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6538255877506581515.post-82270946798878830622010-03-10T13:35:13.917-08:002010-03-10T13:35:13.917-08:00Metacrock, you seem to be arguing "Why can...Metacrock, you seem to be arguing "Why can't I get away with proving something by assuming that it's true?"<br /><br />That strikes me as changing the rules in the middle of the game, and conceding that you don't really have any evidence for your pet beliefs.<br /><br /><b>why are you so ignorant of logic? It's just so absurdly ridiculous that you can't understand anything about burden of proof pimra facie cases or anything related to decion making.</b><br /><br />As to those studies, you seem to be claiming that they state that if you have a mystical experience, you'll be as happy as a clam. So what? It's a kind of experience -- it doesn't access Real Reality or whatever.<br /><br /><br /><b>It's fucking stupid to think that something workign the way it suppossd to is not a sign of trut. you think it is in scinece dont' You? don'tyou say 'scienc works." well religion works becasue this is what its supposed to do.<br /><br />I traced very carefully how the working nature of the experiences underpins the truth connect of bleief and you are just not willing to follow the steps. you have that atheist disease of just not being cable of listening to anything outside the little brain washing they gave you.<br /><br />It's a very simple argument from sign. We use argument from sign in all our reality knowing needs. <br /><br />How do they know smoking causes cancer? Because there's a tight corrolation. It's also because we have a mchenism but we didn't alway have that. and we wouldn't have a mechisms if the mechinism didn't have a corrolation.<br /><br />you have a tight correlation between religious experience and the truth content, because it works. <br /><br />It's real because it has a real impact on your life. The content is about God, so that's a good reason to assume the content is real.</b>Joseph Hinman (Metacrock)https://www.blogger.com/profile/06957529748541493998noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6538255877506581515.post-53426892329565559962010-03-10T03:28:28.345-08:002010-03-10T03:28:28.345-08:00Metacrock, you seem to be arguing "Why can...Metacrock, you seem to be arguing "Why can't I get away with proving something by assuming that it's true?"<br /><br />That strikes me as changing the rules in the middle of the game, and conceding that you don't really have any evidence for your pet beliefs.<br /><br />As to those studies, you seem to be claiming that they state that if you have a mystical experience, you'll be as happy as a clam. So what? It's a kind of experience -- it doesn't access Real Reality or whatever.Lorenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13984896453534621864noreply@blogger.com